Third Party: Forest Practices Board
Intervenor: Council of Forest Industries
APPEAL NO. 2008-FOR-001(b) and 2008-FOR-002(b)
This appeal concerned whether the road maintenance obligations in section 79 of the FPPR require a licensee to replace an old, deteriorated minor culvert with an expensive permanent bridge. The Board joined the appeal to argue that such an expectation goes beyond the normal meaning of regular maintenance. The parties eventually agreed to a consent order allowing the appeal and agreeing that Canfor’s failure to build a new bridge to replace a deteriorated culvert was a contravention of section 79.
Appeal allowed.
Consent Order: http://www.fac.gov.bc.ca/forestPracCode/2008for001_002b.pdf
Third Party: Forest Practices Board
APPEAL NO. 2008-WFA-001 & 002
The appeal issue was how to determine the value of Crown timber destroyed by a wildfire. The Board initially joined to address issues relating to compensation for loss of non-timber resources, but later withdrew given lack of evidence of high non-timber values in the burned area. The FAC’s decision addresses a number of issues concerning stumpage rates applicable to timber damaged due to wildfire.
One appeal allowed in part, and the other allowed by consent.
FAC Decision: http://www.fac.gov.bc.ca/wildfireAct/2008wfa001a_002a.pdf
Third Party: Forest Practices Board
APPEAL NO. 2008-WFA-004
This appeal raised the issue of whether the appellant had an "adequate fire suppression system" for the circumstances.
Appeal withdrawn following a settlement agreement between the appellant and the Ministry.
Special Investigation – SIR/24
December 2008
RECOMMENDATIONS
Exemptions
1. The Board recommends that licensees consider requesting exemptions from fire hazard assessment requirements where it can be demonstrated that circumstances, conditions and practices make the request appropriate.
Fire Hazard Assessment Process
2. The Board recommends that a simpler fire hazard and risk assessment process be developed to accurately assess fire hazard and risk under a wide range of field conditions. This process should include a clear definition of what constitutes a “fire hazard.”
Practices
3. The Board recommends that best management practices to abate fire hazard be developed and shared with licensees and professionals.
Complaint Investigation – IRC/145
September 2008
RECOMMENDATION
The Ministry of Forests and Range should consider removing the December 2006 policy on salvage permits for woodlots, or amending it so that it is consistent with the administrative practices within forest districts. Whichever process is chosen for the administration of blanket salvage permits, it should provide woodlot licensees with as much flexibility as is reasonable to adequately address forest health issues as they arise in the long term.
Complaint Investigation – IRC/144
July 2008
RECOMMENDATION
With appropriate consultation and expert advice, the Ministry of Forests and Range and the Ministry of Environment direct reductions of forage use in the East Kootenay to levels sufficient to achieve a positive and continuing trend in grassland ecosystem condition.
Complaint Investigation – IRC/143
July 2008
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complaint Investigation – IRC/142
July 2008
RECOMMENDATION
The Ministry of Forest and Range’s compliance and enforcement staff contact the complainants to advise them of the outcome of any and all investigations into reported complaints and concerns.
REQUEST
The Board also requests that, as a courtesy, the Ministry of Forests and Range forward their final report regarding the investigation into Edgar’s Road to the Board for review.
Complaint Investigation – IRC/137
May 2008
RECOMMENDATIONS
Interior Rainforest and Rare Lichens
Driscoll Ridge and Ancient Forest Hiking Trails
Special Investigation – SIR/23
May 2008
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Ministry of Forests and Range should: