BC Forest Practices Board 30th Anniversary Logo

News & Publications

Range Practices on the Coutlee Range Unit near Merritt

January 27, 2026
Natural Resource Region: thompson-okanagan
District: cascades

Other Related Documents

Overview

In 2023, the Board received a complaint from two range agreement holders about livestock grazing impacts, fence maintenance and following a grazing schedule in the Mine pasture within the Coutlee Range Unit near Merritt, British Columbia. The complainants, together with four other agreement holders, were authorized to graze livestock on the same range.

As part of its investigation, the Board assessed the condition of the range resources to determine whether the agreement holders met legal requirements under the Forest and Range Practices Act.

What the Board Examined

The Board considered whether the six range agreement holders complied with legal requirements for: 

  • amending a range use plan; 
  • protecting riparian and upland areas; and 
  • maintaining range developments.

Parties Involved

Range Agreement Holders:
  • Avanlee Farm Ltd.
  • Gene Ewalt (complainant)
  • Laura & Neale Brunhild
  • Robert Kuiper / Lower Nicola Cattle Company / Curt & Erica Martendale
  • Robert & Gail Sahara / Haily Rutherford
  • Wayne Schindler (complainant)

Government:  Ministry of Forests (Cascades Natural Resource District)

Key Findings

  • Finding 1: The amended 2023 grazing schedule was not valid. Because all six range agreement holders did not sign the amendment, it was not a legally valid change to the range use plan.
  • Finding 2: Upland functions were significantly impaired. Investigators found grassland and open forest areas within the Mine pasture were not functioning. Long-term overgrazing resulted in impacts including accelerated soil loss and the ground becoming less stable.
  • Finding 3: Riparian areas and range developments examined by investigators were compliant with legal requirements.

Board Commentary

Based on these findings, the Board offers the following commentary. 

Context and Background 

The Board notes that the Ministry of Forests has known about the poor condition of the Mine pasture and the broader range agreement area since 2009.

A 2009 ministry-commissioned forage supply review recommended reducing authorized grazing by more than half, estimating it would take 50 years for the pasture to recover.

Despite some current and planned actions, the authorized forage amount is still more than double what was recommended in the forage supply review.

Board’s Assessment 

The Board believes that non-compliances by the range agreement holders and the ministry’s over-allocation of forage are hindering the achievement of government objectives for the range resource. 

The Board urges range agreement holders and the ministry to take the necessary steps to ensure proper stewardship of the range resource, consistent with government’s objectives.

The Board acknowledges that actions by the ministry and range users in 2024 and 2025, and planned for future years, represent positive steps in the recovery of the Mine pasture. 

Structural Challenges Observed 

This investigation illustrates the coordination challenges that can arise when multiple range agreement holders operate under a single range use plan.

Effective implementation depends on timely cooperation among all agreement holders, which can be difficult to achieve when responsibilities are shared and decisions must be aligned. 

Recurring Theme in Board’s Work 

The Board has repeatedly noted in its range-related investigations and audits that requirements in range use plans are often not measurable and thus not verifiable or enforceable.

This is not appropriate in light of the many resource values that are found on BC’s rangelands. 

Related:  The Board’s special report Measuring and Allocating Forage on Rangelands in BC  discusses the relationship between forage allocation and achievement of government’s objectives for range.

Why This Matters

Enforceable planning requirements support effective oversight. When range use plan requirements are not measurable or verifiable, it becomes difficult to assess whether actions are being carried out and whether they are achieving intended outcomes. This undermines effective stewardship.

Shared tenure arrangements require coordination. Coordinating decisions and actions among six agreement holders operating under a single range use plan can be difficult when responding to declining range conditions. This can delay corrective actions being taken in a timely manner.

Upland degradation affects multiple resource values. When upland grasslands and open forest areas are not functioning, soil stability, water infiltration capacity, and forage productivity are all impacted over time.

Recovery requires sustained effort. Restoring upland function in degraded rangelands takes time and continued attention, even after changes to management practices are implemented.

_______________

Indigenous Acknowledgement

The range agreement area that is subject to the complaint is in the southern part of the Coutlee Range Unit. It borders the Coldwater Indian Reserve to the south and east. The range agreement area is within the territories of 21 First Nations and the Forest Practices Board recognizes their deep connection with the land and the importance of maintaining healthy, functioning rangelands for present and future generations.

_______________

Media & Contact 

For interview requests or additional information, contact:
Tanner Senko, Communications Manager
Email: tanner.senko@bcfpb.ca
Phone: 250-889-8211 

The Board conducts its work throughout British Columbia, and we respectfully acknowledge the territories of the many Indigenous Peoples who have lived on these lands since time immemorial.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram